top of page

Streamlining the QA process and improving company-customer communication

Role: Lead Designer

Partners: 1 Developer

Project goal: Streamline the quality assurance process to minimize time spent, decrease error rates, and improve communication with customers.

Project context

Who is Dynata

Dynata (previously Research Now SSI) is a B2B market research company dealing with a wide variety of customers from big names such as Verizon, to small independent users.

Understanding the process

Currently their system requires a QA team to manually check surveys before approving them to go live. This testing is done for each line item in a market research survey.

Through interviews with the QA team, I discovered their process looks something like this:

Old user flow with pain points

As you can see, there was quite a bit of time wasted by clicking in and out of multiple applications, and there is a high chance of error as the tester does not know specifics of the client’s exceptions and the form questions are ambiguous.

My goal is to streamline their process to look something more like this:

Updated flow

TURNING PROBLEMS INTO SOLUTIONS

To improve the process, I first had to know exactly what was wrong with their current flow. Through user interviews, and a content audit I identified some areas that needed improvements:

Dashboard

OLD DASHBOARD

Old design of QA dashboard

Problems

Too much information on dashboard, cells are truncated and not all information is useful at this level

Looks old and tired, does not fit the current design system

NEW DESIGN

Solutions

Prioritized essential info to reduce clutter

Added quick ‘assign me’ button

Highlights associated line items for quick approval

Line item page

OLD PAGE

Old design of QA line item page

Problems

Difficult to access targeting criteria

Difficult to scan questions requiring manual input

Missing: timer–users were using a 3rd party timer adding complexity to their workflow

Missing: approved client exceptions–leading to error prone QA

Under-utilized feedback input–clients are wondering why their survey was rejected

NEW DESIGN

Solutions

Showcases associated line items for quick approval

Clear and complete targeting information

Questions rephrased to all ideally be “No” with Color highlighting “Yes” for easy scanning of potential problem areas

Fixed-scrolling reference sheet to see client exceptions and additional information

Warning messages to help with writing client feedback if a line item is rejected

Integrated timer to reduce reliance of 3rd party applications

New design of QA line item page

Achievements

Minimized error rates by making the form easier to scan and providing missing information such as client exceptions full targeting information.

Created scalable design to handle variety of customers by adding client information as well as associated line items.

Improved company-customer communication by providing auto-generated error messages instructing customers how to fix the errors.

Copyright 2025 by Kendra Good.

  • LinkedIn
  • Email
bottom of page